EARTHWORM COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS IN THE SOILS OF TWO TERRESTRIAL LAND USE SYSTEMS (BANANA AND FLOWER PLANTATIONS) IN WEST TRIPURA (INDIA)

Main Article Content

SHILPA DHAR
PRIYASANKAR CHAUDHURI

Abstract

Banana is the most established, economically important fruit crop in India. Floriculture is also of great commercial importance. As earthworms are important soil macrofauna which have a great role in soil fertility and crop production, the present study deals with the differences in the earthworm communities in the soils of banana and flower plantations of West Tripura (India). The study was conducted during March 2015 to November 2017. Earthworms were collected from the banana and flower plantations by digging (25 cm x 25 cm x 30 cm) and hand-sorting method. Temperature, moisture, pH and organic matter were estimated from 0-15 cm depth of soils because earthworms are mostly concentrated within 15 cm depth. Biological parameters such as density, biomass, relative abundance and ecological parameters viz. indices of diversity, dominance etc. were measured. Analysis of earthworm communities in the studied sites revealed the presence of 12 species of earthworms belonging to 4 families and 10 genera in the banana plantations and 7 species of earthworms belonging to 4 families and 6 genera in the flower plantations. The similarity quotient was 63% between the two habitats (banana and flower). The average density and biomass of earthworms in the flower plantations were 186 ind. m-2 and 92 g m-2 respectively   which were significantly (p< .05) higher than that of the mean density (154 ind. m-2) and biomass (76 g m-2) of earthworms in the banana plantations. Shannon diversity index was comparatively higher in the banana plantations (0.78) than that of flower plantations (0.60) whereas, Simpson dominance index was more in flower plantations (0.42) than that in banana plantations (0.23). Less number of earthworm species in the flower gardens compared to banana plantations was possibly due to its monoculture nature and higher management practices. Monthly fluctuations of earthworm density (juvenile, young and adult) along with soil temperature (°C) showed that pre-monsoon to post-monsoon i.e. April-November are the most suitable periods for earthworm activity and reproduction.

Keywords:
Banana, diversity, dominance, earthworm, flower

Article Details

How to Cite
DHAR, S., & CHAUDHURI, P. (2020). EARTHWORM COMMUNITY CHARACTERISTICS IN THE SOILS OF TWO TERRESTRIAL LAND USE SYSTEMS (BANANA AND FLOWER PLANTATIONS) IN WEST TRIPURA (INDIA). UTTAR PRADESH JOURNAL OF ZOOLOGY, 41(9), 40-54. Retrieved from https://www.mbimph.com/index.php/UPJOZ/article/view/1584
Section
Original Research Article

References

De LC, Singh DR. Floriculture industries, opportunities and challenges in Indian hills. International Journal of Horticulture. 2016; 6(13):1-9.

Edwards CA, Bohlen PJ. Biology and ecology of earthworms. Chapman & Hall, London. 1996;426.

Huerta E, Rodriguez-Olan J, Evia-Castillo I, Montejo-Meneses E, cruz-Mondragon MDL, Garcia-Hernandez R, Uribe S. Earthworms and soil properties in Tabasco, Maxico. European Journal of Soil Biology. 2007;43(1): 190-195.

Adil MF, Sehar S, Nordin NHB, Chaudhry AN, Jilani G, Shamsi IH, Shakoor N. Effect of spatio-temporal and landuse variability on earthworm distribution in mango orchards. Wulfenia Journal. 2019; 26(5):63-83.

Blanchart E, Julka JM. Influence of forest disturbance on earthworm (Oligochaeta) communities in the Western Ghats (South India). Soil Biology & Biochemistry. 1997;29: 303-306.

Kotcon JB. Population dynamics of earthworms in organic farming systems. In: Karaca A, (Ed.) Biology of earthworms. Springer, Berlin. 2011;209-310.

Najar IA, Khan AB. Earthworm communities of Kashmir valley, India. Tropical Ecology. 2011;52(2):151-162.

Mariappan V, Karthikairaj K, Isaiarasu L. Relationship between earthworm abundance and soil quality of different cultivated lands in Rajapalayam, Tamilnadu. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2013;27(10):1278- 1281.

Goswami R. Determination of ecological diversity indices to assess the interrelationship between earthworm diversity and different habitats of Indian Botanic garden, Howrah, India. Biological Forum. 2015;7(1):128-136.

Dhar S, Chaudhuri PS. Earthworm communities in banana (Musa paradisiaca) and paddy (Oryza sativa) plantations of west Tripura, India. In: Solanki GS, (Ed.) Biodiversity Conservation: Strategy and Application.South Eastern Book Agencies, Guwahati. 2018;303-320.

Chaudhuri PS, Nath S, Paliwal R. Earthworm population of rubber plantation (Hevea brasilensis) in Tripura, India. Tropical Ecology. 2008;49:225-234.

Gates GE. Burmese earthworms. An introduction to the systematics and biology of Megadrile oligochaetes with special reference to south-east Asia. Transactions of the American Philosophical Society. 1972;62(7):1-326.

Julka JM. The Fauna of India and Adjacent Countries: Megadrile Oligochaeta (Earthworms). Kolkata: Zoological Survey of India; 1988.

Shannon CE, Weaner W. The Mathematical theory of communication. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; 1963.

Simpson EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 1949;163:688.

Menhinick EF. A comparison of some species diversity indices applied to samples of field insects. Ecology. 1964;45:859–861.

Dash MC, Dash SP. Fundamentals of Ecology. MC Graw-Hill, New Delhi; 2009.

Sorenson T. A method of establishing group of equel amplitude in plant society based on similarity of species content. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab Biologiske Skrifter. 1948;5:1-34.

Ramesh T, Hussain KJ, Selvanayagam M, Satpathy K, Prasad MVR. Patterns of diversity, abundance and habitat associations of butterfly communities in heterogeneous landscapes of the department of atomic Kenergy (DAE) campus at Kalpakkam, South India. International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation. 2010;2(4):75–85.

Walkley A, Black IA. Determination of organic carbon in soil. Soil Science. 1934;37:29-38.

Daji JA. A Text Book of Soil Science. Media Promoters and Publishers Pvt. Ltd., Bombay; 1996.

Kolmogorov AN. Sulla determinazione empirica di una legge di distribuzione (On the empirical determination of a distribution law). Giornalle dell Instituto Italiano degli Attuari. 1933;4:1-11.

Smirnov NV. On the estimation of the discrepancy between empirical curves of distribution for two independent samples. Bulletin Moscow University. 1939;2:3-16.

Dey A, Chaudhuri PS. Earthworm communities in pineapple (Ananus comosus) and mixed fruit plantations of West Tripura, India. Tropical Ecology. 2014;55(1):1-7.

Chakraborty S, Chaudhuri PS. Earthworm communities in the Bamboo plantations of West Tripura (India). Proceedings of Zoological Society. 2017;70(2):105-118.

Jamatia SKS, Chaudhuri PS. Earthworm community structure under tea plantation (Camellia sinensis) of Tripura (India). Tropical Ecology. 2017a;58:105-113.

Debbarma B, Chaudhuri PS. Earthworm communities under pasture ecosystems in Tripura, India. International Journal of Ecology and Environmental Sciences. 2019;45(2):179-190.

Dhar S, Chaudhuri PS. Earthworm communities in paddy (Oryza sativa) fields of West Tripura (India). Proceedings of Zoological Society; 2020.

Available:https://doi.org/10.1007/s12595-019-00313-6

Halder KR. Oligochaeta: Earthworm. In: State Fauna series 4: Fauna of Meghalaya. Part 9, Kolkata: Zoological survey of India. 1999;393-439.

Rajkhowa DJ, Bhattacharyya PN, Sarma AK, Mahanta K. Diversity and distribution of earthworms in different soil habitats of Assam, North-east India, an Indo-Burma biodiversity hotspot. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, India, Section B, Biological Sciences. 2015;85:389-396.

Haokip SL, Singh TB. Diversity and distribution of earthworms in a natural reserved and disturbed sub-tropical forest ecosysytem of imphal-West Manipur. International Multi-disciplinary Research Journal. 2012;2(2):28-34.

Budijastuti W. Type of earthworm in the banana tree habitat. Journal of Physics: Conference Series; 2019.

DOI:10.1088/1742-6596/1277/1/012029

Fragoso C, Lavelle P. The earthworm communities of a tropical rainforest from Mexico (Chajul, Chiapas). In: Bonvicini Pagliai AM, Omodeo P, (Eds.) On earthworms. Mucchi, Modena, Italy. 1987; 281-295.

Reynolds JW. The earthworms of Bangladesh (Oligochaeta: Megascolecidae, Moniligastridae and oligochaetidae). Megadrilogica. 1994;5:33-44.

Julka JM, Paliwal R, Kathireswari P. Biodiversity of Indian earthworms- an overview. In: Edwards CA, Jeyaraaj R, Jayarag IA, (Eds.) Proceedings of Indo-US workshop on Vermitechnology in Human Welfare (2007) Rohini Achagam, Tamil Nadu. 2009;36-56.

Nath S, Chaudhuri PS. Human induced biological invasions in rubber (Hevea brasiliensis) plantations of Tripura (India) – Pontoscolex corethrurus as a case study. Asian Journal of Experimental Biological Sciences. 2010;1:360-369.

Jamatia SKS, Chaudhuri PS. Species diversity and community characteristics of earthworms in managed and degraded tea plantations of Tripura. Journal of Enviromental Biology. 2017b;38:1349-1356.

Fragoso C, Lavelle P, Blanchart E, Senapati BK, Jimenez JJ, Martinez MA, Decaens T, Tondoh J. Earthworm communities of tropical agro ecosystems: origin, structure and influence of management practices. In: Lavelle P, Brussaard L, Hendrix P, (Eds.) Earthworm Management in Tropical Agro-ecosystems. CAB International, Wallingford, UK. 1999;27-55.

Gonzalez G, Huang CY, Zou X, Rodriguez C. Earthworm invasions in the tropics. Biological Invasions. 2006;8:1247–1256.

Hendrix PF, Baker GH, Callaham Jr. MA, Damoff GA, Fragoso C, Gonzalez G, James SW, Lachnicht SL, Winsome T, Zou X. Invasion of exotic earthworms into ecosystems inhabited by native earthworms. Biological Invasions. 2006;8:1287-1300.

Engelmann HD. Undersuchangen zur Erfassung Pedo-zoogener component in difinicten okosystem, Forschungsberichte aus dem Staatlichen Museum für Naturkunde, Görlitz. Acta Hydrobiologica. 1973; 23:349-361.

Sosa JAT. Earthworms of the banana groves from Tenerife (Canary Islands). Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 1992;24:1369-1375.

Lapied E, Lavelle P. The peregrine earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus in the east coast of Costa Rica. Pedobiologica. 2003;47:471-474.

Sarlo M. Individual tree species effects on earthworm biomass in a tropical plantation in Panama. Caribbean Journal of Science. 2006; 42(3):419–427.

Chaudhuri PS, Chakraborty S. Impact of five different species of bamboo plantations on earthworm communities in West Tripura (India). Records of Zoological Survey of India. 2019;119(1):18-33.

Speratti AB, Whalen JK. Carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide fluxes from soil as influenced by anecic and endogeic earthworms. Applied Soil Ecology. 2008;38:27-33.

Chapuis-Lardy L, Brauman A, Bernard L, Pablo AL, Toucet J, Mano MJ, Weber L, Brunet D, Razafimbelo T, Chotte JL, Blanchart E. Effect of the endogeic earthworm Pontoscolex corethrurus on the microbial structure and activity related to CO2 and N2O fluxes from a tropical soil (Madagascar). Applied Soil Ecology. 2010;45:201-208.

Don A, Steing B, Schoning I, Pritisch K, Joschko M, Gleixner G, Schulze ED. Organic carbon sequestration in earthworm burrows. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2008;40:1803-1812.

Blanchart E, Albrecht A, Brown GG, Decaëns T, Duboisset A, Lavelle P, Mariani L, Roose E. Effects of tropical endogeic earthworms on soil erosion. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment. 2004;104:303–315.

Lavelle P, Barot S, Blouin M, Decaens T, Jimenez JJ, Jouquet P. Earthworms as key actors in self-organised soil systems. In: Cuddington KMD, Byers JE, Hastings A, Wilson WG, (Eds.) Ecosystem Engineers: Plants to Protists. Concepts, Theory, and Applications in Ecology. Elsevier. 2007;77-106.

Bhattacharjee G, Chaudhuri PS. Cocoon production, morphology, hatching pattern and fecundity in seven tropical earthworm species—A laboratory-based investigation. Journal of biosciences. 2002;27(3):283- 94.

Olive PJW, Clark RB. Physiology Of reproduction. In: Mill PJ. (Ed.) Physiology of annelids. Academic Press, London. 1978;271–368.